Re: [44net] 44Net Digest, Vol 3, Issue 19

Send 44Net mailing list submissions to 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu You can reach the person managing the list at 44net-owner(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of 44Net digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: amprnet portal (Bryan Fields) 2. Re: amprnet portal (kb9mwr(a)gmail.com) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:09:57 -0500 From: Bryan Fields &lt;Bryan(a)bryanfields.net&gt; To: AMPRNet working group &lt;44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu&gt; Subject: Re: [44net] amprnet portal Message-ID: &lt;52E595C5.9090303(a)bryanfields.net&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 1/26/14 2:20 PM, kb9mwr(a)gmail.com wrote: My segment 44.98.254.0/24 is being used for one PtP data link now, and some asterisk based repeater controllers. I have email for kb9mci.net on it (but need to get SWIP/PTR going Brian ;). My intent is to fire up some of the doodle labs 23cm link cards as we get another repeater site and link it over on that space. As this grows over the next couple years it will be quite a high speed data network with VoIP as the primary purpose. Doing all the RF links in the ham bands is part of the fun. (anyone have a OFDM rated 20-30 watt amp for 23cm that's not $2k?) One of the pet peeves I've have is not being able to access the other AMPR net space with out tunnels. I think tunnels are just an ugly hack IMO. I'd like to see us transition into more of a regionally routed network, rather than the few BGP nets and UCSD gateway. Well aware of how much time this would take I'm not ready to write up a proposal just yet (ampRFC?). If anyone wants a subnet I'd be happy to route it to you, as I'm not using the whole /24 and won't be for some time. Global routing policies being what they are, a /24 is the smallest subnet you can announce. My interest lies in high speed networks, and see little to no value in 9600 baud IP networks in 2014 :) 73's -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice 727-214-2508 - Fax http://bryanfields.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:06:01 -0600 From: kb9mwr(a)gmail.com To: &quot;44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu&quot; &lt;44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu&gt; Subject: Re: [44net] amprnet portal Message-ID: < CAK4XxyT5f_UxV5CpzHRX9O0QEtUbGxD0txexZHGRDQTTdA_9yg(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Brian, Interesting, thanks for sharing. Amplifiers are something I really think the ham community needs to think about. They exist, but like you say, but at outrageous prices. i.e.: http://www.shireeninc.com/300-500mhz-20-watts-outdoor-amplifier/ I have been reading Dubus magazine (focused on microwave), hoping to read more data oriented construction articles. I am much in the same line of thinking. 1200 and 9600 is really not worth re-deploying in 2014. The regulatory landscape needs some major changes so that manufactures can put something different in the hands of many. Steve ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net End of 44Net Digest, Vol 3, Issue 19 ************************************