I completely disagree. We should be moving forward, not backwards to 2 decade old band-aid internetworking technology, which means eventually all routing should be based on BGP when traffic needs to travel beyond the 'local' 44-net resources. If IPIP or a VPN is needed to tunnel to a small subnet, then it should tie to an upstream router that can handle the BGP routing.
------------------------------ John D. Hays K7VE PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223 http://k7ve.org/blog http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Marc, LX1DUC lx1duc@rlx.lu wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) Yes, actually I know but I thought the routing loop at UCSD would be temporary. OTOH those BGP-but-no-IPIP-guys are breaking the AMPRnet and MUST fix their installation!