11 Apr
2014
11 Apr
'14
4:39 p.m.
I fully welcome you to investigate and escalate this apparent infraction
on my part.
--Bart
On 4/11/2014 9:26 AM, lleachii(a)aol.com wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> Bryan F,
>
> TOS section 7c requires him to provide an AMPRNet connection for AMPR devices local
to him; but not necessarily via rip44. Since its not valid at this time to tunnel to a
44subnet via a 44 address, I don't see how he's in compliance (save via RF, which
is their local AMPRNet anyway).
>
> Bart also mentioned:
>
>>> It allows our microwave network to remain connected to the rest of
>>> AMPRnet as long as we have at least 1 ISP that isn't dead.
> **The problem would also solved if he announces 209.189.196.68/32 on both ISP
connections.**
>
>
>
>
> -Lynwood
> KB3VWG
>
>
>