I fully welcome you to investigate and escalate this apparent infraction on my part.
--Bart
On 4/11/2014 9:26 AM, lleachii@aol.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Bryan F,
TOS section 7c requires him to provide an AMPRNet connection for AMPR devices local to him; but not necessarily via rip44. Since its not valid at this time to tunnel to a 44subnet via a 44 address, I don't see how he's in compliance (save via RF, which is their local AMPRNet anyway).
Bart also mentioned:
It allows our microwave network to remain connected to the rest of AMPRnet as long as we have at least 1 ISP that isn't dead.
**The problem would also solved if he announces 209.189.196.68/32 on both ISP connections.**
-Lynwood KB3VWG