24 Mar
2014
24 Mar
'14
5:30 p.m.
You make some good points, Tom.
However, we have exactly 0 active users in NJ and so this is all moot
for now. I gotta start somewhere.
I've seen nor been told anything that says AMPR must use mesh routing.
Please, do tell?
And why would a ham microwave network need 16K addresses? are they
offering service to the general public? As it happens I have plenty of
space left over for just such a scenario - but more by luck than
judgement :)
Mark
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Tom Hayward <esarfl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Mark Phillips <g7ltt(a)g7ltt.com> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hi all,
It's a work in progress but the following link should provide a link
to the IP 44/8 address allocation document for NJ.
http://mrprosser.g7ltt.com
We have very little AX.25 traffic in NJ but we do have a growing Mesh
community which would benefit from this space.
Hands up if you want some!
Mark
I'm not sure I understand how breaking up subnets to counties like
this is helpful. Is your routing actually hub-and-spoke like you say
in the document, with a central router in each county? Do hams in that
county connect directly to the central router for routing? Whether
BGP, OSPF, or IPIP, I thought the plan for AMPR was do use mesh
routing.
I've seen a case in AMPR where addresses were pre-allocated
geographically instead of by network. Despite only having 3 registered
hosts in the state, the coordinator did not have enough "free" space
to allocate a large /19 subnet to a multi-county microwave network.
Tom KD7LXL
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net