Thank you for that clarification. I missed that.
--
Dave K9DC
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 17:21, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net
44net@mailman.ampr.org wrote:
>
> Hello Dave! This current proposal does not renumber anyone between 44.64 and 44.127 (inclusive) unless they want to move to 44.128/10. The exact wording is that we leave all existing allocations there, and we simply don’t make new ones, in the future.
>
> I hope this clarifies the proposal a little bit.
>
> Antonis
>
>> On 28 Jul 2021, at 23:14, Dave Gingrich via 44Net
44net@mailman.ampr.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> Not only that, fully half of the networks in .US would have to move. Those states that were unlucky enough to have been numbered above 44.63, in order to clear 44.64/10 from active assignment. This includes 44.127 “multinational” block, which includes the /20 IRLP uses, assigned just a few months ago. It would be fairly easy for me to move to a new block below 44.63, but I have to ask why? I am guessing other folks would have a much more difficult time.
>>
>> Dave K9DC
>