16 Jun
2015
16 Jun
'15
12:21 p.m.
In 44.24.0.0/16 we have multiple BGP gateways coming on line.
We have moved address space to accommodate larger masks and people have
been willing to move as we explain the rationale and provide a window of
time to accomplish the movement.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Bryan Fields <bryan(a)bryanfields.net> wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> I'm on a plane, sorry for the top post.
>
> Brian, how much traffic does the current AMPRnet gw handle peak?
>
> Would it be possible to aggregate some of these routes selectivily or have
> some people volunteer to move ip? In the greater scheme of things 350
> prefixes is not huge.
>
> My concern would be on the routing db and filter side. But this could be
> automated via rpsl.
>
>
>
> On June 16, 2015 12:00:09 PM EDT, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
> >(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> >_______________________________________________
> >On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:09:45AM -0700, Cory (NQ1E) wrote:
> >> Do we have a rough idea on how many /24s that would amount to?
> >
> >After summarizing the smaller routes at the /24 level, the number of
> >subnet routes that would have to be advertised is about 350. If we
> >summarize at the /16 level, there would have to be about 12.
> >
> >We *know* that most of the approx 475 gateways in the database are no
> >longer active. These are still contributing to this total.
> >
> >Despite multiple requests by Chris, so far no one with PHP programming
> >experience has stepped forward to help write the program that is
> >necessary
> >to clear them out. I would wager that the number of subnet routes
> >necessary would drop precipitously if we were to eliminate the inactive
> >gateways.
> > - Brian
> >_________________________________________
> >44Net mailing list
> >44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
> >http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>
> --
> Bryan Fields
> 727-409-1194
> http://bryanfields.net
>