5 Nov
2016
5 Nov
'16
11:09 p.m.
Ah, I stand corrected; I've updated the entry. The section on 44.128/16 was
pointing to an obsolete article that incorrectly gave the impression that
that subnet was unroutable like an RFC1918 network, whereas it's really just
reserved for testing.
Unfortunately, there's an article on www.eastnetpacket.net that incorrectly
states that it *IS* an RFC1918-style network and people outside the AMPRNet
are quoting it as justification for using the network AS an unrouted network.
- Brian
If so anyone
can edit it, it's wikipedia.
You can look at revision history as well, to
determine what was changed and
possibly change it back.