5 Nov
2016
5 Nov
'16
10:09 p.m.
Ah, I stand corrected; I've updated the entry. The section on 44.128/16 was pointing to an obsolete article that incorrectly gave the impression that that subnet was unroutable like an RFC1918 network, whereas it's really just reserved for testing.
Unfortunately, there's an article on www.eastnetpacket.net that incorrectly states that it *IS* an RFC1918-style network and people outside the AMPRNet are quoting it as justification for using the network AS an unrouted network. - Brian
If so anyone can edit it, it's wikipedia.
You can look at revision history as well, to determine what was changed and possibly change it back.