6 Mar
2012
6 Mar
'12
3:39 p.m.
Certainly anything more specific than a /24 could be ignored / filtered by core routers on
the net. It is also bad behavior as folks that run core routers don't want a zillion
route prefixes announced filling up their route tables.
But to that, one could announce say a /24 or larger for a region and then it could be
routed downstream to Net44 hosts with more specific routes (ie, /25 through /30), at lease
as far as the global net community goes. This, of course, is ignoring what routing
policies that Net44 is under.
Tim
On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:01:46PM -0800, Assi
Friedman wrote:
Shouldn't it be up to the router user to
decide if they want to do directly
routed or tunneled subnets?
Assi kk7kx
There's the issue of BGP-announcing little pieces of net 44. Right now UCSD
is announcing the whole thing.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net