Certainly anything more specific than a /24 could be ignored / filtered by core routers on the net. It is also bad behavior as folks that run core routers don't want a zillion route prefixes announced filling up their route tables.
But to that, one could announce say a /24 or larger for a region and then it could be routed downstream to Net44 hosts with more specific routes (ie, /25 through /30), at lease as far as the global net community goes. This, of course, is ignoring what routing policies that Net44 is under.
Tim
On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:01:46PM -0800, Assi Friedman wrote:
Shouldn't it be up to the router user to decide if they want to do directly routed or tunneled subnets? Assi kk7kx
There's the issue of BGP-announcing little pieces of net 44. Right now UCSD is announcing the whole thing.
- Brian
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net