That's what I thought.
Thanks
Liz
KI5PGJ
On October 17, 2024 7:37:21 PM MDT, Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If the commercial provider is using RF links where the
frequencies are NOT in the amature spectrum space then have at er. If rhe frequencies are
within the amature allocation than the traffic passing over that part of the network shall
not be encrypted.Sent on the go, from somewhere other than here.
-------- Original message --------From: Dave Koberstein via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: 2024-10-17 6:22 p.m. (GMT-08:00) To: KI5PGJ
<ki5pgj(a)placebonol.com> Cc: Rebecca Key <rebecca(a)ardc.net>et>, lleachii--- via
44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Subject: [44net] Re: US encryption question over IPv6
transport The traffic over the air can't be encrypted. It's ok to encrypt it over
other parts of the path that aren't ham radio. Is that what you were asking or did I
misunderstand?--DaveSent from my mobile...On Thu, Oct 17, 2024, 6:12 PM KI5PGJ via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:So, I know 44 traffic over wireless has to be
unencrypted, however can 44 traffic run over encrypted wireless site to site IPv6
network. I have access to IPv6 rural Internet wireless provider commercial network,
besides fiber to their sites they also have P2P wireless links. They encrypt their P2P
traffic, they run VXLAN over these paths and said they could provide a VLAN where they
share an RF site with an amateur repeater.Thanks LizKI5PGJ
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org