17 Jun
2019
17 Jun
'19
6:10 a.m.
well there is channel -0 and -1 available on 2.4 thats amateur use only.
stick something up on 3.5 or 5g as backhaul
On 6/16/2019 11:25 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:
Can you see further than a few hundred yards with your
local 2.4GHZ? I
can't here in Wayne, PA. This would allow me to get something going rather
than nothing.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:07 AM Leon Zetekoff <wa4zlw(a)backwoodswireless.net>
wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using
2.4 or 5g for high
bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in
"packet
radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the
fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our
emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice
opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour
Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net