16 Jun
2019
16 Jun
'19
4:07 p.m.
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high
bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in "packet
radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the fastest links to our
audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our emergency net . That way we will work in
Voip rather then analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
16 Jun
16 Jun
4:25 p.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
Can you see further than a few hundred yards with your local 2.4GHZ? I
can't here in Wayne, PA. This would allow me to get something going rather
than nothing.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:07 AM Leon Zetekoff <wa4zlw(a)backwoodswireless.net>
wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4
or 5g for high
bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in
"packet
radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the
fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our
emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice
opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
17 Jun
17 Jun
12:10 a.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
well there is channel -0 and -1 available on 2.4 thats amateur use only.
stick something up on 3.5 or 5g as backhaul
On 6/16/2019 11:25 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:
Can you see further than a few hundred yards with your
local 2.4GHZ? I
can't here in Wayne, PA. This would allow me to get something going rather
than nothing.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:07 AM Leon Zetekoff <wa4zlw(a)backwoodswireless.net>
wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using
2.4 or 5g for high
bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in
"packet
radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the
fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our
emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice
opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour
Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
16 Jun
16 Jun
11:17 p.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least
a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you
searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in
the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
Ray vk2tv
On 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4
or 5g for high
bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in
"packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the
fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for
our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog
voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
11:57 p.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
On 17/06/19 08:17, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur
links for at
least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get
you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved
in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
I'd like to play
with this technology, but also not sure who's around.
Could possibly spark some interest at the local club, who are a pretty
progressive lot, and I'd be more than happy to leverage both my 44.x
address space and my LinBPQ node, which still needs more configuration
to become fully operational.
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
17 Jun
17 Jun
12:11 a.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
I have it running across the bench. If you want to see how it goes point
your browser at http://g7ltt.dyndns.org:2210. I was quite surprised at how
fast the text elements of the web page appeared. I've not had time to try
the MMDVM across it but it was working very well at 200kbps. I suspect that
it'll log in but not be able to sustain any audio at 70kbps?
Mark
G7LTT/NI2O
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:57 PM Tony Langdon <vk3jed(a)vkradio.com> wrote:
On 17/06/19 08:17, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity
amateur links for at
least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get
you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved
in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
I'd like to play
with this technology, but also not sure who's around.
Could possibly spark some interest at the local club, who are a pretty
progressive lot, and I'd be more than happy to leverage both my 44.x
address space and my LinBPQ node, which still needs more configuration
to become fully operational.
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
18 Jun
18 Jun
12:05 a.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
I just added the MMDVM hotspot to the link. At 70kbps simplex (so really
35kbps) I was surprised that it held up at all. Starts to get a bit
popy-farty when other traffic is on the link though.
Mark
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:11 PM Mark Phillips <g7ltt(a)g7ltt.com> wrote:
I have it running across the bench. If you want to see
how it goes point
your browser at http://g7ltt.dyndns.org:2210. I was quite surprised at
how fast the text elements of the web page appeared. I've not had time to
try the MMDVM across it but it was working very well at 200kbps. I suspect
that it'll log in but not be able to sustain any audio at 70kbps?
Mark
G7LTT/NI2O
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:57 PM Tony Langdon <vk3jed(a)vkradio.com> wrote:
On 17/06/19 08:17, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity
amateur links for at
least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get
you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved
in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
I'd like to play
with this technology, but also not sure who's around.
Could possibly spark some interest at the local club, who are a pretty
progressive lot, and I'd be more than happy to leverage both my 44.x
address space and my LinBPQ node, which still needs more configuration
to become fully operational.
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
17 Jun
17 Jun
12:11 a.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
Yeah and theres AREDN too. Tried to contact the supposedly "locals" over
the years to no avail.
leon wa4zlw
On 6/16/2019 6:17 PM, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur
links for at
least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get
you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved
in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
Ray vk2tv
On 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using
2.4 or 5g for high
bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom
in "packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement
the fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf
for our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then
analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
12:14 a.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
Nowadays you should look at http://arednmesh.orgSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: vk2tv <vk2tv(a)exemail.com.au> Date: 17/06/19
10:17 (GMT+12:00) To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org Subject: Re: [44net] NPR (New Packet Radio)
: new firmware with 56kBaud and
120kBaud Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a
couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield
... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/This video (or others like it) might pique your
curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvcoI live in a regional area with no
hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my
interest.Ray vk2tvOn 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:> hi there...sound good but
why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high > bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap
enough and works well.>> 73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA>> On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM,
pete M via 44Net wrote:>> To:>> AMPRNet working group
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>>>>>>> A big thank you for that effort.
This will surely start a new boom in >> "packet radio" in north America. I
for one will push to implement the >> fastest links to our audio links back bones
that is all in uhf for >> our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather
then analog >> voice opening the way to many more service at the same time
.>>>> Télécharger Outlook pour
Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>>>> ---> This email has been checked for
viruses by Avast antivirus software.> https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
_________________________________________> 44Net mailing list>
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net>________________________…
mailing list44Net@mailman.ampr.orghttps://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
12:32 a.m.
New subject: Meta: mailing messages to this list
Folks, please don't post messages from your smartphone (or anything
else) unless you can control the message format. Otherwise you're
going to spew unintelligible crap like the below into some 800+
subscribers' mailboxes. And if at all possible, TRIM OUT as much
of the message you're replying to as you can.
Thank you.
- Brian
Nowadays you should look at http://arednmesh.orgSent
from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: vk2tv <vk2tv(a)exemail.com.au> Date: 17/06/19
10:17 (GMT+12:00) To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org Subject: Re: [44net] NPR (New Packet Radio)
: new firmware with 56kBaud and
120kBaud Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a
couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield
... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/This video (or others like it) might pique your
curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvcoI live in a regional area with no
hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my
interest.Ray vk2tvOn 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:> hi there...sound good but
why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high > bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap
enough and works well.>> 73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA>> On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM,
pete M via 44Net wrote:>> To:>> AMPRNet working group
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>>>>>>> A big thank you for that effort.
This will surely start a new boom in >> "packet radio" in north America. I
for one will push to implement the >> fastest links to our audio links back bones
that is all in uhf for >> our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather
then analog >> voice opening the way to many more service at the same time
.>>>> Télécharger Outlook pour
Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>>>> ---> This email has been checked for
viruses by Avast antivirus software.> https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
_________________________________________> 44Net mailing list>
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net>________________________…
mailing list44Net@mailman.ampr.orghttps://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
2:27 a.m.
New subject: NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
Been looking at that also. We are working on a local net using ubiquity device but those
nice radio 2.4 and 5.8 ghz don't do 100 miles links easily. You need very large dish
and damn good solid base that won't move in the winds to make it work. So you are
stuck on smaller jumps and if you are lucky there is a mountain top that works for that.
But in a place like the province of Quebec, where we have plains as larger then many
states in the USA and some other region that have peaks in the 1000 meter to 1500 meter
high. ( more then 150 of those peaks) and almost all of those are in the wilderness with
road to go there.. so we need links that can do 200 km or more. And 2.4ghz won't cut
it at those distance.
De : vk2tv
Envoyé : dimanche 16 juin 18 h 19
Objet : Re: [44net] NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud
À : 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least
a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you
searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
1778
days inactive
1779
days old
10 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Brian Kantor -
eddie -
Leon Zetekoff -
Mark Phillips -
pete M -
Tony Langdon -
vk2tv