hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To: AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in "packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Can you see further than a few hundred yards with your local 2.4GHZ? I can't here in Wayne, PA. This would allow me to get something going rather than nothing.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:07 AM Leon Zetekoff wa4zlw@backwoodswireless.net wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To: AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in
"packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
well there is channel -0 and -1 available on 2.4 thats amateur use only. stick something up on 3.5 or 5g as backhaul
On 6/16/2019 11:25 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:
Can you see further than a few hundred yards with your local 2.4GHZ? I can't here in Wayne, PA. This would allow me to get something going rather than nothing.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:07 AM Leon Zetekoff wa4zlw@backwoodswireless.net wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To: AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in
"packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
Ray vk2tv
On 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To: AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in "packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
On 17/06/19 08:17, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
I'd like to play with this technology, but also not sure who's around. Could possibly spark some interest at the local club, who are a pretty progressive lot, and I'd be more than happy to leverage both my 44.x address space and my LinBPQ node, which still needs more configuration to become fully operational.
I have it running across the bench. If you want to see how it goes point your browser at http://g7ltt.dyndns.org:2210. I was quite surprised at how fast the text elements of the web page appeared. I've not had time to try the MMDVM across it but it was working very well at 200kbps. I suspect that it'll log in but not be able to sustain any audio at 70kbps?
Mark G7LTT/NI2O
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:57 PM Tony Langdon vk3jed@vkradio.com wrote:
On 17/06/19 08:17, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
I'd like to play with this technology, but also not sure who's around. Could possibly spark some interest at the local club, who are a pretty progressive lot, and I'd be more than happy to leverage both my 44.x address space and my LinBPQ node, which still needs more configuration to become fully operational.
-- 73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL http://vkradio.com
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
I just added the MMDVM hotspot to the link. At 70kbps simplex (so really 35kbps) I was surprised that it held up at all. Starts to get a bit popy-farty when other traffic is on the link though.
Mark
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:11 PM Mark Phillips g7ltt@g7ltt.com wrote:
I have it running across the bench. If you want to see how it goes point your browser at http://g7ltt.dyndns.org:2210. I was quite surprised at how fast the text elements of the web page appeared. I've not had time to try the MMDVM across it but it was working very well at 200kbps. I suspect that it'll log in but not be able to sustain any audio at 70kbps?
Mark G7LTT/NI2O
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:57 PM Tony Langdon vk3jed@vkradio.com wrote:
On 17/06/19 08:17, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
I'd like to play with this technology, but also not sure who's around. Could possibly spark some interest at the local club, who are a pretty progressive lot, and I'd be more than happy to leverage both my 44.x address space and my LinBPQ node, which still needs more configuration to become fully operational.
-- 73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL http://vkradio.com
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
Yeah and theres AREDN too. Tried to contact the supposedly "locals" over the years to no avail.
leon wa4zlw
On 6/16/2019 6:17 PM, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
Ray vk2tv
On 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To: AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in "packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
Nowadays you should look at http://arednmesh.orgSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: vk2tv vk2tv@exemail.com.au Date: 17/06/19 10:17 (GMT+12:00) To: 44net@mailman.ampr.org Subject: Re: [44net] NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvcoI live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.Ray vk2tvOn 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:> hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high > bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.>> 73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA>> On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:>> To:>> AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org>>>>>> A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in >> "packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the >> fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for >> our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog >> voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .>>>> Télécharger Outlook pour Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36>>> ---> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.> https://www.avast.com/antivirus%3E _________________________________________> 44Net mailing list> 44Net@mailman.ampr.org> https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net%3E__________________________... mailing list44Net@mailman.ampr.orghttps://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
Folks, please don't post messages from your smartphone (or anything else) unless you can control the message format. Otherwise you're going to spew unintelligible crap like the below into some 800+ subscribers' mailboxes. And if at all possible, TRIM OUT as much of the message you're replying to as you can.
Thank you. - Brian
Nowadays you should look at http://arednmesh.orgSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: vk2tv vk2tv@exemail.com.au Date: 17/06/19 10:17 (GMT+12:00) To: 44net@mailman.ampr.org Subject: Re: [44net] NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvcoI live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.Ray vk2tvOn 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:> hi there...sound good but why aren't we using 2.4 or 5g for high > bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.>> 73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA>> On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:>> To:>> AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org>>>>>> A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom in >> "packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement the >> fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf for >> our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then analog >> voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .>>>> Télécharger Outlook pour Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36>>> ---> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.> https://www.avast.com/antivirus%3E _________________________________________> 44Net mailing list> 44Net@mailman.ampr.org> https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net%3E__________________________... mailing list44Net@mailman.ampr.orghttps://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net _________________________________________
Been looking at that also. We are working on a local net using ubiquity device but those nice radio 2.4 and 5.8 ghz don't do 100 miles links easily. You need very large dish and damn good solid base that won't move in the winds to make it work. So you are stuck on smaller jumps and if you are lucky there is a mountain top that works for that. But in a place like the province of Quebec, where we have plains as larger then many states in the USA and some other region that have peaks in the 1000 meter to 1500 meter high. ( more then 150 of those peaks) and almost all of those are in the wilderness with road to go there.. so we need links that can do 200 km or more. And 2.4ghz won't cut it at those distance.
De : vk2tv Envoyé : dimanche 16 juin 18 h 19 Objet : Re: [44net] NPR (New Packet Radio) : new firmware with 56kBaud and 120kBaud À : 44net@mailman.ampr.org
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur links for at least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get you searching further afield ... http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
-
Brian Kantor -
eddie -
Leon Zetekoff -
Mark Phillips -
pete M -
Tony Langdon -
vk2tv