13 Jun
2015
13 Jun
'15
4:31 p.m.
Also by using EIGRP, non-44net traffic wouldn't incur routing loops for
traffic coming in.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Don Fanning <don(a)00100100.net> wrote:
Makes complete sense. EIGRP would work well then in
having multiple
non-44net end points for 44-net traffic. It's costing by the lowest
latency. So if for some reason the path to one BGP gateway is higher, it
would automatically route to a lower latency BGP gateway. How you route
between other IPIP endpoints would be entirely up to you.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:19 PM, John Wiseman <john.wiseman(a)cantab.net>
wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
The IPIP mesh doesn't have a single point of failure. Sites on the mesh
can
talk to each other quite happily without UCSD. Only access from non-44
internet addresses and from those who like to play at being an ISP is
lost,
and I'm quite happy without either.
But then I'm a radio ham first and foremost, not someone trying to show
how
clever I am at IP networking.