Also by using EIGRP, non-44net traffic wouldn't incur routing loops for traffic coming in.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Don Fanning don@00100100.net wrote:
Makes complete sense. EIGRP would work well then in having multiple non-44net end points for 44-net traffic. It's costing by the lowest latency. So if for some reason the path to one BGP gateway is higher, it would automatically route to a lower latency BGP gateway. How you route between other IPIP endpoints would be entirely up to you.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:19 PM, John Wiseman john.wiseman@cantab.net wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ The IPIP mesh doesn't have a single point of failure. Sites on the mesh can talk to each other quite happily without UCSD. Only access from non-44 internet addresses and from those who like to play at being an ISP is lost, and I'm quite happy without either.
But then I'm a radio ham first and foremost, not someone trying to show how clever I am at IP networking.