7 Feb
2013
7 Feb
'13
1:13 a.m.
My thoughts are people probably should not be announcing BGP prefixes on
the Internet if they have a issue of not giving out their contact info. I
believe the initial intent of rwhois with regard to AMPRNet is only for people
who are announcing prefixes via BGP. Not the small "sub" assignments within said
announced BGP prefixes.
I agree that if people want to drill down deeper into the announcements
they should either Email the person responsible for that announcement (contact
from rwhois) or if it's a AMPRNet user then they can log into the portal and
view it also if AMPRNet will allow that.
Tim Osburn
www.osburn.com
W7RSZ
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Brian Kantor wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:20:23 -0800
From: Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu>
Reply-To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Subject: Re: [44net] whois/rwhois
We're looking into a whois/rwhois service, but there are issues of privacy and
spam to be considered. My first thought is to make a lookup available only to
someone logged into the portal site.
- Brian