25 Apr
2014
25 Apr
'14
4:07 p.m.
Why all this talk about BGP? Real men and women network engineers
should use IS-IS :-)
Seriously though, I agree with those who are on the side of making
44-net MORE accessible and beneficial to average Amateur Radio
Operators. Requiring CCNA/CCIE level networking knowledge is not the
way to go. The IP-IP/RIP44 tunnel system is complicated enough, but at
least it can be done with easily available hardware and Linux. I also
agree that most ISP's are not going to want to advertise chunks of
44-net without someone paying for it.
I would like to see a backup to the UCSD gateway, but understand that
would be complicated for a variety of reasons.
-Neil
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Neil Johnson <neil.johnson(a)erudicon.com> wrote:
The University of Iowa being one of them
(128.255.0.0/16) :-). It's
where I work.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Dean Gibson AE7Q <ampr(a)ae7q.com> wrote:
--
Neil Johnson
http://erudicon.com
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On 2014-04-24 23:35, YT9TP Pedja wrote:
--
Neil Johnson
http://erudicon.com
...
Actually there is a big difference. Within 44.x.x.x you have safe IP
addressing. It is impossible to have address conflicts with any other
network if you interconnect.
This reminds me of a company I worked for many years ago, which chose
128.x.x.x as its internal IP address space.
Yes, there were certain external sites they could not visit.
Yes, they went out of business (in 2002).
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net