Why all this talk about BGP? Real men and women network engineers should use IS-IS :-)
Seriously though, I agree with those who are on the side of making 44-net MORE accessible and beneficial to average Amateur Radio Operators. Requiring CCNA/CCIE level networking knowledge is not the way to go. The IP-IP/RIP44 tunnel system is complicated enough, but at least it can be done with easily available hardware and Linux. I also agree that most ISP's are not going to want to advertise chunks of 44-net without someone paying for it.
I would like to see a backup to the UCSD gateway, but understand that would be complicated for a variety of reasons.
-Neil
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Neil Johnson neil.johnson@erudicon.com wrote:
The University of Iowa being one of them (128.255.0.0/16) :-). It's where I work.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Dean Gibson AE7Q ampr@ae7q.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________
On 2014-04-24 23:35, YT9TP Pedja wrote:
...
Actually there is a big difference. Within 44.x.x.x you have safe IP addressing. It is impossible to have address conflicts with any other network if you interconnect.
This reminds me of a company I worked for many years ago, which chose 128.x.x.x as its internal IP address space.
Yes, there were certain external sites they could not visit.
Yes, they went out of business (in 2002).
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
-- Neil Johnson http://erudicon.com