Eric,
OK, well, since I want to get it *CORRECT* and I'm still not understanding you...I wanted to be certain you are aware that we currently use dynamic routing via two methods, ENCAP (so long as the station uses some method to regularly update the file) and RIP44. Where I'm seeking clarity is on the statement:
with each subnet peering with the other subnets which they decide to voluntarily exchange traffic with
If you receive a dynamic routing statement over RIP44 or ENCAP, you're receiving all valid routes from the core 44 router. You're suggestion implies that you'd remove routes you do not wish to communicate with; or you'd explicitley firewall them. That confuses me because you go on to state:
Various subnets then provide transit to other non peered subnets by use of dynamic routing protocols
Why would you delete/firewall routes from your dynamically populated table, just to have another gateway route traffic on your behalf (who received the route information from the same source)?
-KB3VWG