Re: [44net] TAPR DCC 2016 - anyone going?

On 15/08/2016 5:29 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:

+1 though I don't think we need an IPv6 'numbering' plan as we need a network trust plan and enumerate all the 'trusted' networks whether they be IPv6 or net-44. The increasing ease of obtaining IPv6 address space and connectivity, particularly for end-users, changes the paradigm of having to rely on a single netblock for address space. The latter results in inefficient tunnelling and aggregated points of failure at the net-44 'gateways' that simply aren't necessary in an IPv6 world.

That's true. I'm certainly happy to allocate some of my /56 to ham radio applications, once the trust model is sorted out. At this point, I'm only using one /64 of my /56.