That is a misunderstanding about how the proposed new core network is working. It does NOT preclude the use of individual tunnels between friends, and it does NOT preclude the announcement of a private /24 on internet using BGP. It is a method to facilitate easier connection for those that do not have the luxury of a static IP and incoming IPIP passing through their ISP router. That is becoming more and more common, and a solution is required not to lock out those that cannot have a suitable internet connection. Even VPS offerings from major providers all over the world no longer are capable of participating in the IPIP tunnel mesh directly, as their "control panel firewall" only allows TCP and UDP ports to be opened incoming (replies on outgoing traffic are usually allowed).
Furthermore, the new core network allows people all over the world to have connection with internet when they want that, with round-trip times and packet loss rates that are usable for applications like voice protocols (VoIP, D-Star, DMR, Fusion etc), without being FORCED to do a BGP announcement for that. It is more or less a standardization of service already offered in some places of the world (e.g. here in the Netherlands) so that everyone can use that kind of connection, not just those that happen to live in an area where this is already deployed. But when someone wants to do it "the old way", they still can do that.
Rob
On 2/6/21 4:09 AM, Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty via 44Net wrote:
You act or it is already decided. There are also clearly disadvantages of what some have proposed and I don't talk about backups of ucsd to Internet, what is good. No, it is that it makes amprnet gateways more (or totally) dependent on other core (ARDC) routers to route to other amprnet gateways over Internet. It doesn't make it less dependent, it adds another layer on top of that. Presently, I'm more or less independent with my individual tunnels (and I care less that they are using ipip or another protocol) or when I should be running bgp. Instead that the risk is spread, it will be more concentrated with these proposals what I have read here and at the 44NGN list. This all to make it more easier? I'm already providing a lot of these services.
Bob VE3TOK
On 2021-02-05 09:59, Rob PE1CHL via 44Net wrote:
Hopefully the "new core network" will be deployed "soon" so that indivuduals have no need to route a subnet via BGP just to get short roundtriptime to internet. It will make it much easier to be connected to AMPRnet and internet without having to know and handle all that BGP related information.
Rob
On 2/5/21 3:38 PM, Angelo via 44Net wrote:
When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change
Max Planck
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net