4 Apr
2014
4 Apr
'14
1:09 a.m.
Thus one of the better reasons to use a vpn/tunneling protocol between
islands that incorporates authentication and do peering on an individual
basis. It forces you to authenticate that you are who you say and by the 2
responsible parties one on each side of the link agreeing to peer on an
individual basis and exchanging keys to authenticate the link those parties
on each end thus expressly agree to carry each others traffic on a
reciprical basis. If you don't like the network policies or of traffic
from another network island no one is forcing you to peer with them or
accept their traffic.
Eric
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Jann Traschewski <jann(a)gmx.de> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On 03.04.2014 01:09, Robbie De Lise wrote:
I hope we will never sell 44net ip space, since
we
will never be able to get something like this back.
Furthermore it would break our authentication based on net44 source
addresses. We offer radio services only for source IP addresses out of
44/8 (e.g. access to the Packet Radio network or shortwave SDR
transceivers).
Since we don't have an __easy__ solution for authentication of radio
amateurs over the internet, building an Intranet for radio amateurs
within 44/8 seems to be a good choice...
73,
Jann
--
Jann Traschewski, Faber-Castell-Str. 9, D-90522 Oberasbach, Germany
Tel.: +49-911-696971, Mobile: +49-170-1045937, E-Mail: jann(a)gmx.de
Ham: DG8NGN / DB0VOX, http://www.qsl.net/dg8ngn
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net