Thanks for posting this. I didn't know.
Michael N6MEF
-----Original Message----- From: 44Net 44net-bounces+n6mef=mefox.org@mailman.ampr.org On Behalf Of Brian Kantor Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 8:48 AM To: AMPRNet working group 44net@mailman.ampr.org Subject: Re: [44net] Echolink proxy/relay hosting
That is what the block 44.190.0.0 is set aside for. The intent is to divide it up into /24s to be BGP-routed directly to the Internet, and people who otherwise would send 44.x.x.x traffic via radio or tunnel should insert a special routing rule that directs 44.190.0.0/16 to their ISP instead of the radio or tunnels, if they can.
- Brian
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:25:31AM -0700, Christopher S. Munz-Michielin wrote:
I agree with Jann's comment that it would be useful to have these services located within a dedicated allocation to prevent Ampr-Internet routing complexity. Chris
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net