This concept of POP is already in the todo list from the TAC team.
Of course multiple type of networking connection should be available. OpenVPN, WIREGUARD ,
even L2TPv3 for simple and secure bridging could be use.
Pierre
VE2PF
________________________________________
De : 44Net <44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com(a)mailman.ampr.org> de la part de Rob
PE1CHL via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Envoyé : 11 août 2021 12:24
À : 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
Cc : Rob PE1CHL
Objet : Re: [44net] Use cases
The beauty of the concept of the backbone network with PoPs is that every user can select
the VPN
protocol that they like (from the protocols offered by the PoP) and that not everyone has
to use the
same protocol. Some people may like OpenVPN because they know it, others may prefer
L2TP/IPsec
because their router supports it, others may want to use wireguard or openconnect.
Of course it will not be possible to offer everything invented in the world and still
keep it managable,
but at least there is no need to agree all on using the same protocol as there is with the
IPIP mesh.
We can add new protocols as they become available or become more attractive due to
changing
circumstances (e.g. support IPv6 both on inner and outer address, independently of
course).
Rob
On 8/11/21 6:16 PM, KUN LIN via 44Net wrote:
If we will be connecting to the POP via VPN, I would
highly recommend Wireguard instead of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is kind of slow.
Kun
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net