20 Apr
2018
20 Apr
'18
3:41 a.m.
Le 19/04/2018 à 17:25, Christopher S. Munz-Michielin a écrit :
I agree with Jann's comment that it would be
useful to have these
services located within a dedicated allocation to prevent
Ampr-Internet routing complexity.
That's already what most people do. Some time ago, I had a look at the
D-Star hosts file : only 1% of the IPs were using 44.0.0.0 space.
My personal opinion is that amateur radio guys should use amateur radio
IP addresses whenever possible. And amateur radio network operators
should make ise of those IP easier for everybody.
Our approach here in Corsica is to consider our AMPR allocation as we
could consider an enterprise network :
- Some machines are "private" (in the "amateur radio" meaning). These
will be on "LAN".
- Some other machines, such as a WEB server (or D-Star repeater), need
public Internet access. These would be put in a "DMZ"
Then, we'll split our allocation into LANs and DMZs. Access rules will
be managed by firewalls. But IP routing will be direct, with no more NAT
or dual-addressing. That's a first step to what we'll have to do when we
decide to migrate to IPv6, HI :-)
73 de TK1BI