10 Aug
2021
10 Aug
'21
5:23 a.m.
Le 28/07/2021 à 00:31, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net a écrit :
Fellow radio amateurs, I am writing to you on behalf
of the ARDC TAC, which I represent.
Those of you that were on our Community Call last Saturday may remember that I promised
you we would share our first proposal with the community. A few days after that, I am
happy to send that to you for your review, feedback, comments, questions, and
information!
You can find our 5-page PDF here: https://pdf.daknob.net/ardc/tac128.pdf
<https://pdf.daknob.net/ardc/tac128.pdf>
Sorry for late answer. I was on holiday, working on a music festival
which took all of my time and my energy :-) I had to review all the
unread messages :-)
Just to say I fully agree with the TAC proposal.
Here in Corsica, we've been experimenting such a scenario for 2 years now :
- a 44.168 "Intranet" subnet (routed locally on the island)
- a 44.190 "Internet" subnet (routed on Internet via BGP)
Every endpoint router has two VLANs labeled "Intranet" and "Internet",
dual addressing and dual routing. Every router (currently, OpenWRT) has
two sets of Ethernet interfaces. Connecting an equipment to "Internet"
or "Intranet" is just a matter of plugging it on the right router
interface (or setting the interface in "untagged" mode on the right VLAN
if using a L2 switch). For example, D-Star or DMR repeaters are
connected to "Internet" interfaces, while Asterisk analog VoIP repeaters
are connected to "Intranet" interfaces.
This topology works well and suits all of our current and future needs.
The only constraint for us with the TAC proposal is that we'll have to
renumber our 44.190.11.0/24 to something in 44.0.0.0/10. We have 21
child prefixes and 40 IP addresses to renumber. Of course, this will
require some time, but it's not as if we had thousands of addresses :-)
If we don't make mistakes, all can be done remotely :-)
73 de TK1BI