Le 28/07/2021 à 00:31, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net a écrit :
Fellow radio amateurs, I am writing to you on behalf of the ARDC TAC, which I represent.
Those of you that were on our Community Call last Saturday may remember that I promised you we would share our first proposal with the community. A few days after that, I am happy to send that to you for your review, feedback, comments, questions, and information!
You can find our 5-page PDF here: https://pdf.daknob.net/ardc/tac128.pdf https://pdf.daknob.net/ardc/tac128.pdf
Sorry for late answer. I was on holiday, working on a music festival which took all of my time and my energy :-) I had to review all the unread messages :-)
Just to say I fully agree with the TAC proposal.
Here in Corsica, we've been experimenting such a scenario for 2 years now : - a 44.168 "Intranet" subnet (routed locally on the island) - a 44.190 "Internet" subnet (routed on Internet via BGP)
Every endpoint router has two VLANs labeled "Intranet" and "Internet", dual addressing and dual routing. Every router (currently, OpenWRT) has two sets of Ethernet interfaces. Connecting an equipment to "Internet" or "Intranet" is just a matter of plugging it on the right router interface (or setting the interface in "untagged" mode on the right VLAN if using a L2 switch). For example, D-Star or DMR repeaters are connected to "Internet" interfaces, while Asterisk analog VoIP repeaters are connected to "Intranet" interfaces.
This topology works well and suits all of our current and future needs.
The only constraint for us with the TAC proposal is that we'll have to renumber our 44.190.11.0/24 to something in 44.0.0.0/10. We have 21 child prefixes and 40 IP addresses to renumber. Of course, this will require some time, but it's not as if we had thousands of addresses :-) If we don't make mistakes, all can be done remotely :-)
73 de TK1BI