9 Nov
2018
9 Nov
'18
10:09 a.m.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2018, at 6:59 PM, Lin Holcomb
<LHolcomb(a)clearqualitygroup.com> wrote:
Just saying as it is “private” property there is no reason that part of the
space could not be leased to pay for multiple access points, VPN, hosting
ect. The market is ripe the price has probably peaked and a lease is not a
permanent re-assignment. Having users wards off the vultures. If there was
a system of VPN outlets it would provide the ability for hams to “host”
their applications at their house, tower ect. I would pay for this. I do
pay for this now, but it does not have a 44net address.
That would not be difficult at all. Announce a /24 via BGP and then you could hand out a
bunch of /28 or /29s via any number of VPN technologies.