11 Jun
2017
11 Jun
'17
6:51 p.m.
Hi Brian, thanks for your explanation. I was not aware of that
requirement. I thought that every entry in the encap file, either host
or network, it was fully routed. I will email Pedro LU7ABF to ask for
the update.
Also thanks to Brian N1URO and Tom SP2L for their feedback.
73!
Gustavo
LU7WA
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 20:44:38 -0300
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:56:14 -0700
From: Brian Kantor <Brian(a)UCSD.Edu>
To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Subject: Re: [44net] Routing problem?
Message-ID: <20170610005614.GB9749(a)UCSD.Edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Amprgw filters at the per-host (/32) level. Each host which is to receive
traffic from the Internet into AMPRNet must individually be listed in
the permissions file, which is built from the AMPR.ORG DNS 'A' records.
The only host on your subnet which is listed (and therefore is the only
one authorized) is 44.153.164.5. If you want .6 or other hosts on your
subnet to be able to communicate with the Internet, you will need to
have your local coordinator add them to the DNS for you. Or I can do it.
- Brian