Re: [44net] 44Net Digest, Vol 6, Issue 112 - 44net

11 Jun 2017

Hi Brian, thanks for your explanation.  I was not aware of that 
requirement.  I thought that every entry in the encap file, either host 
or network, it was fully routed. I will email Pedro LU7ABF to ask for 
the update.
Also thanks to Brian N1URO and Tom SP2L for their feedback.

73!

Gustavo
LU7WA

Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 20:44:38 -0300
...
  Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:56:14 -0700
 From: Brian Kantor &lt;Brian(a)UCSD.Edu&gt;
 To: AMPRNet working group &lt;44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu&gt;
 Subject: Re: [44net] Routing problem?
 Message-ID: &lt;20170610005614.GB9749(a)UCSD.Edu&gt;
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Amprgw filters at the per-host (/32) level.  Each host which is to receive
 traffic from the Internet into AMPRNet must individually be listed in
 the permissions file, which is built from the AMPR.ORG DNS 'A' records.

 The only host on your subnet which is listed (and therefore is the only
 one authorized) is 44.153.164.5.  If you want .6 or other hosts on your
 subnet to be able to communicate with the Internet, you will need to
 have your local coordinator add them to the DNS for you.  Or I can do it.
 	- Brian 