Not only that, fully half of the networks in .US would have to move. Those states that were unlucky enough to have been numbered above 44.63, in order to clear 44.64/10 from active assignment. This includes 44.127 “multinational” block, which includes the /20 IRLP uses, assigned just a few months ago. It would be fairly easy for me to move to a new block below 44.63, but I have to ask why? I am guessing other folks would have a much more difficult time.
Dave K9DC
On Jul 28, 2021, at 16:41, John Ronan via 44Net 44net@mailman.ampr.org wrote:
Finally, those OMs who have Internet routed Subnets (outside 44.143) would have to move, but its clearly worth the effort.
ACK
I disagree, I'm after reading the proposal carefully front to back for the third time today. The more I read it the more I'm coming to the conclusion is that it seems to be un-necessary work being thrust upon everyone in the 44.128/10 space to renumber their networks just to have the exact same feature set and (now thoroughly annoyed) users after all the effort. This doesn't actually make any sense to me now. Surely we can be more ambitious and do better than that?
John EI7IG