On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Javier Henderson (javier) <
javier(a)cisco.com> wrote:
One problem
that comes to mind is SSL wouldn't be allowed on 44net unless
everyone has the private key and I doubt ARRL will release that.
Why would you need the private key to the ARRL CA root certs?
How do I know the packet you are sending me is really a LOTW public
certificate? You could be sending secrets against J. Edgar Hoover!
No, I do know the signature packet itself is just data or a hash of public
data. Problem is that it is - in essence - encrypted data in which you
only share part of it. The just because it could be argued that it skirts
the legality of the law does it mean that it is clear of the meaning of the
law.