17 Apr
2014
17 Apr
'14
1:50 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Javier Henderson (javier) < javier@cisco.com> wrote:
One problem that comes to mind is SSL wouldn't be allowed on 44net unless everyone has the private key and I doubt ARRL will release that.
Why would you need the private key to the ARRL CA root certs?
How do I know the packet you are sending me is really a LOTW public certificate? You could be sending secrets against J. Edgar Hoover!
No, I do know the signature packet itself is just data or a hash of public data. Problem is that it is - in essence - encrypted data in which you only share part of it. The just because it could be argued that it skirts the legality of the law does it mean that it is clear of the meaning of the law.