23 Aug
2013
23 Aug
'13
8:41 a.m.
Why is having rip routes sent from multiple places such a BAD thing? Is it
not a GOOD thing to have a choice on multiple redundant routes from one
place on the mesh to another? Say my direct route from node A to node B
drops, but we both can connect to node C? I could route through node C but
I don't know that route is valid unless node C tells node A about
reachability of node B and node B about reachability of node A. seems
everyone in the mesh ought to be running a dynamic routing protocol thus
increasing redundancy and reliability.
AF6EP
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Hugh Golding <hugh(a)teqsys.net> wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> Sorry about the RIP routes. After some work on my router the RIP was turned
> on for all interfaces.
>
>
>
> I have now rectified this and all should have stopped.
>
>
>
> Apologies.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Hugh G7UOD
>
>
> ) +44 7841 749345
>
> * g7uod(a)onlineham.net
>
>
>
>