Why is having rip routes sent from multiple places such a BAD thing? Is it not a GOOD thing to have a choice on multiple redundant routes from one place on the mesh to another? Say my direct route from node A to node B drops, but we both can connect to node C? I could route through node C but I don't know that route is valid unless node C tells node A about reachability of node B and node B about reachability of node A. seems everyone in the mesh ought to be running a dynamic routing protocol thus increasing redundancy and reliability.
AF6EP
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Hugh Golding hugh@teqsys.net wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Hi Guys,
Sorry about the RIP routes. After some work on my router the RIP was turned on for all interfaces.
I have now rectified this and all should have stopped.
Apologies.
Best Regards,
Hugh G7UOD
) +44 7841 749345
- g7uod@onlineham.net