Re: [44net] ipencap routing question -> What about the future ?

Tony, Check the rest of your mails, chris sent an email explaining. “ As an aside, the old 44NGN mailing list was retired some months ago due to lack of use. Today I cleared the old membership out and have re-purposed it for the group we are putting together to discuss this topic, as this seemed appropriate. So further to Bdale’s, Rosy’s and my request, if you would like to be part of the group, which will effectively be a sub-committee of the TAC then please let us know and I can add you to the new, revived list. You can email me, or contact@ampr.org<mailto:contact@ampr.org><mailto:contact@ampr.org> Thanks, Chris - G1FEF” Ruben - ON3RVH On 30 Dec 2020, at 06:22, Tony Langdon via 44Net &lt;44net(a)mailman.ampr.org&gt; wrote: On 29/12/20 8:47 pm, Ruben ON3RVH via 44Net wrote: I'm all for standardization! There was already a mailinglist created for the new routing infrastructure thoughts and ideas a while ago by late Brian at our request. IIRC that was the 44ngn mailinglist. I do recall some folks not wanting to have yet another mailinglist to follow/comment on Hmm, I was on this mailing list but just got unsubscribed, with no explanatory text (when one would normally get if it was due to bounces, etc). -- 73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL http://vkradio.com _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net