9 Nov
2018
9 Nov
'18
12:31 a.m.
This is what has already been done in many countries.
However one would not want to connect from say France, Netherlands or Belgium, ... to a
vpn gateway in the states and have everything routed there.
That would give us way too much latency.
The other way round would be that Americans would not want to connect to a gateway in
Europe and have everything routed over Europe.
You would need geographically placed POPs that can serve a region with minimal latency to
and from the internet. Like we are doing today.
Ruben - ON3RVH
On 9 Nov 2018, at 04:10, James Sharp
<james(a)fivecats.org> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2018, at 6:59 PM, Lin Holcomb
<LHolcomb(a)clearqualitygroup.com> wrote:
Just saying as it is “private” property there is no reason that part of the
space could not be leased to pay for multiple access points, VPN, hosting
ect. The market is ripe the price has probably peaked and a lease is not a
permanent re-assignment. Having users wards off the vultures. If there was
a system of VPN outlets it would provide the ability for hams to “host”
their applications at their house, tower ect. I would pay for this. I do
pay for this now, but it does not have a 44net address.
That would not be difficult at all. Announce a /24 via BGP and then you could hand out a
bunch of /28 or /29s via any number of VPN technologies.
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net