Re: [44net] misconfigured encap routers?

On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:34 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)UCSD.Edu> wrote: (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ I've been analyzing some of the encap traffic and finding unexpected things. Several sources of ipencap'd packets being received by amprgw have non-44 inner source addresses. Would you all agree that a protocol-4 (ipencap) packet reaching the UCSD gateway should always have an inner (encap'd) source address on the 44-net? And that those that don't should be considered bogus and be discarded? - Brian _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net