Absolutely. I can't think of a reason why someone would be using the gateway otherwise.
Neill K6NRT
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:34 PM, Brian Kantor Brian@UCSD.Edu wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ I've been analyzing some of the encap traffic and finding unexpected things.
Several sources of ipencap'd packets being received by amprgw have non-44 inner source addresses.
Would you all agree that a protocol-4 (ipencap) packet reaching the UCSD gateway should always have an inner (encap'd) source address on the 44-net? And that those that don't should be considered bogus and be discarded?
- Brian
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net