Well,
Perhaps I have jumped to conclusions believing the idea was to see AMPRnet as a network with intradomain-routing+iBGP inside and eBGP peering interdomain?
Otherwise we would just split up AMPRnet, or?
On 2012-03-17 00:09, Antonio Querubin wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________
To facilitate interdomain peering at several sites on the globe, I guess there is a need for a separate public AS number for 44/8. There shouldn't be a problem getting that.
Completely unnecessary. You just need to announce more specific prefixes and negotiate transit with your upstreams.