9 Apr
2021
9 Apr
'21
11:17 a.m.
Well it of course depends on your local rules and the actual enforcement of those.
Here in the Netherlands we happily use WPA2-EAP for user access (logging in with callsign
as username and a randomly chosen password), and we use https on top of that without
fear.
The local radio authority is not at all interested in monitoring that kind of thing and
acting on it.
And indeed, when using ISM channels they have nothing to enforce at all, we are just
regular users that happen to have an amateur radio license.
We only need to make sure that we have proper DFS and power settings.
Rob
On 4/9/21 5:35 PM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
I dont know what is the status of this case but I am
asking here if anyone had some factual information on this.
As we are using the frequency that are into the ISM band, We are also using device that
are type accepted for that band.
Those device are used legally with encryption by normal lambda user. If we dont modify
the device power and frequency would it be legal for ham to also encrypt the signal?
I understand that if we would use a higher power, different channel I would understand
that we are now out of the ISM band rules.
Pierre
VE2PF
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net