Re: [44net] 44 Network behind BGPed 44 Address

Lynwood; On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 11:18 -0500, lleachii(a)aol.com wrote: No, I did not mention anything of the sort. This would only make it more complicated than it needs to be. Something parallel to the below would work. if ampr-route == rip { than ((route -> table 1) && (ruleset = route via encap)); } else { ((route -> table main) && (uleset = route via internet)); }; All we would need for the rip broadcaster is some sort of a flag (ie: host == 0.0.0.0 would work fine) to which the ampr-ripd would ignore adding the BGP hosted route into your encapsulated ruleset. Anthing else is purely overkill. In your follow-up mail, you suggest using a 44.x.x.x HOST IP as the flag. Any flag works here. You misunderstood my previous mail. -- If Microsoft intended Windows to be for ham usage, they would have incorporated our protocols into their kernel. 73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org> Web: http://www.n1uro.net/ Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/ Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org Linux Amateur Radio Services axMail-Fax & URONode AmprNet coordinator for: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.