Lynwood;
On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 11:18 -0500, lleachii@aol.com wrote:
You suggested somehow incorporating interfaces into RIP44 announcements;
No, I did not mention anything of the sort. This would only make it more complicated than it needs to be.
Something parallel to the below would work.
if ampr-route == rip { than ((route -> table 1) && (ruleset = route via encap)); } else { ((route -> table main) && (uleset = route via internet)); };
All we would need for the rip broadcaster is some sort of a flag (ie: host == 0.0.0.0 would work fine) to which the ampr-ripd would ignore adding the BGP hosted route into your encapsulated ruleset. Anthing else is purely overkill.
In your follow-up mail, you suggest using a 44.x.x.x HOST IP as the flag. Any flag works here. You misunderstood my previous mail.