I agree with Rob! Normally you should start upgrading the connection if the average reaches 50% of it's capacity
-- Tim (PH4T)
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 10:03, Rob PE1CHL via 44Net 44net@mailman.ampr.org wrote:
Yes it would be worthwile to research (with the IP address as information) what could be the reason behind this. Assuming it was not 44.0.0.1 but some amateur's IP, it could be some retaliation against that person and they may be able to identify a likely source and legal action may be possible.
Aside from that, I think there is too little headroom on this connection and it needs to be upgraded to 10Gbit or some teamed 1Gbit links when that is more practical. The background noise already takes up 650Mbit/s of the 1Gbit/s available...
Rob
On 9/27/21 9:33 AM, Marius Petrescu via 44Net wrote:
Tnx. Chris for the update.
I'm still wondering what the goal of such an attack is...
On 27/09/2021 10:30, Chris Smith via 44Net wrote:
So, it was a TCP port 80 attack directed against one IP address.
I passed this on to my contacts at CAIDA who passed it onto the UCSD
NOC who have got the IP blocked.
The traffic has now returned to normal.
Chris - G1FEF
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net