Hi folks,
Thanks so much for the discussion on this last week. It was really
helpful to see your thoughts and feedback. We also got to have some
discussion about this internally this morning – or, well, evening for
Chris.
Aside from server stability and backup issues (which have been solved)
the other problems we were looking at were:
* Searching the archives (previously unavailable)
* Providing a space for discussion between grantees / for topics that
are outside the scope of the 44net mailing list
* Within that discussion, allowing for participants to find threads by topic
* Creating cross-pollination between grantees and 44net mailing list
members.
Given that the cross-pollination is a nice-to-have rather than a
need-to-have, that the new mailman interface does allow for searching
the archives, and that migrating this mailing list to any new system
will likely come with pain and user drop-off, it makes sense for this
mailing list to remain on its existing and updated mailman instance. We
can always create a forum (e.g. Groups.io or Discourse) for other topics.
If / when we create such a forum space, obviously everyone here will be
invited. In the meantime, please continue to enjoy this updated Mailman.
And thank you, Chris, for all the work you've done to make it happen.
73,
Rosy
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
On 4/22/22 12:48 PM, Paul Sladen via 44net wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, Jorge Santos via 44net wrote:
[XYZ] is the best solution
Depends what something is being measured against.
What we have not yet seen documented is what "the problem" is.
-Paul
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org