How so?
VE7ASS
On Aug 6, 2019, at 12:08, Victor Vaida via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Wrong
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:52 AM K7VE - John via 44Net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
> 1. The 44/8 (now 44.0.0.0/9 and 44.128.0.0/10) was never owned by "the
> community"
> - It was obtained by *an individual* as a resource to be used by the
> amateur radio community
> - It passed through a series of individuals and has been used by the
> amateur radio community (at no charge/no contract)
> - A wise decision was made to form a public benefit non-profit
> corporation to own the address space, rather than an individual
> and it was
> assigned to that corporation.
> - That corporation has a board of volunteer directors, who receive no
> salary, and oversee its operation under their legal by-laws. It has
> no
> *members* or shareholders.
> 2. The portion of addresses that were sold was not in use (with the
> exception of a block in Germany and the leaders of that community were
> agreeable - they can adopt new addresses). They were not used in a way
> that is routed to the general Internet as addressable nodes.
> 3. The corporation had no formal mechanism to "consult" with the amateur
> radio community and no obligation to do so. Again, no members and more
> importantly no contract.
> 4. People who thought differently, need to study this out and move on.
>
> ------------------------------
> John D. Hays - K7VE
> Kingston, WA
> <http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
> <http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
> _________________________________________