On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 14:19 -0700, Brian Kantor spaketh:
Yes, I'd like to see more people working on
networking over the air
using amateur radio.
Otherwise we're just another branch of the Internet and there's nothing
new or exciting about that.
I totally agree, and to add to this thought;
I have yet to see any thread in here in which validates convincing
fellow hams into getting on the amprnet via RF whether it be 2m or 5Ghz!
Everyone agrees, "you can spend a hundred here or a couple hundred
there... for high speed RF..." Now think about this (and I'm only being
realistic not trying to be a killjoy) but; How on earth are you going to
sell this concept of high speed networking at an additional cost that's
more severly government regulated than what they're paying NOW for
commercial internet per month? Note: end users will *never* tally a
yearly cost in their figures, they will compare a $39.95 figure (even if
it's only per month) vs $100.00 for something that allows them to do
less on the network they're linked to.
As further food for thought, why do we have an internet mail list for
packet when there's an alleged packet mail system (fbb/bpqbbs/etc) that
we can use - and allegedly use RADIO for? Is this our group's
subconscious admitting to ourselves packet doesn't work? Is it proof by
action we really prefer to be an underground ISP?
Where are the new L7 apps? I saw some suggestions before about them,
then they were kicked aside as being too government regulated and
dropped... which brings the question of what's all this robust dynamic
routing/networking going to serve? How do you sell it to the end user
who is going to see a lower cost for commercial internet and less
regulation (aka: more L7) than for any RF?
Here in the NorthEast US, we couldn't convince hams to install 9600 baud
when 2400 baud dialup into a local BBS was the thing and residential
internet accounts were basically unheard of... how would that change
today? A higher bandwidth then didn't fly, what seriously has changed
now (except the providers have increased their speeds at cheaper costs)?
I'm not looking for flames, I'm looking for opinions here...
Thanks for reading this.
</SoapBox>
--
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web:
http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1:
http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2:
http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Delaware, all New England,
and New Jersey.