22 Apr
2018
22 Apr
'18
5:39 a.m.
On 22/04/18 07:44, K7VE - John wrote:
Wasn't the idea to 44.190.0.0/16 subnets available
via BGP? If so, why
would there be NAT?
Well, I'm not talking about the 44.190 end, but if I host
some service
on my 44.190 for net 44, then if I am routing 44.190.8.x via my ISP,
there will be NAT on my end. As I said to someone else, if all I'm
doing is hosting Echolink proxies and relays, it's a non issue, but if I
want to use the server for something else, it could be an issue.
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com