Re: [44net] Echolink proxy/relay hosting

On 22/04/18 07:44, K7VE - John wrote:

Wasn't the idea to 44.190.0.0/16 subnets available via BGP? If so, why would there be NAT?

Well, I'm not talking about the 44.190 end, but if I host some service on my 44.190 for net 44, then if I am routing 44.190.8.x via my ISP, there will be NAT on my end.  As I said to someone else, if all I'm doing is hosting Echolink proxies and relays, it's a non issue, but if I want to use the server for something else, it could be an issue.